In-House Programmatic

    The Trade Desk Fees Explained: Platform Fee, Data Fees and What the 10-K Shows

    Published · Last updated
    Next scheduled review:

    The Trade Desk fees start with a platform fee charged as a percentage of each client's total spend. Its 2025 filing implies the company kept 21.6% of gross spend (10-K, FY2025). Data, add-on features and agency fees sit on top, and the filing does not split them out.

    Contents

    Key facts

    • The fee is a share of spend. The Trade Desk charges "a platform fee generally based on a percentage of our clients' total spend on our platform" and also earns revenue from value-added services and data (The Trade Desk 10-K, FY2025).
    • The implied take rate rose to 21.6% in 2025. Revenue was $2,896.3 million on gross spend of $13,394.7 million, against 20.3% in 2024 ($2,444.8 million on $12,040.9 million) (The Trade Desk 10-K, FY2025).
    • Third-party data has its own price list. Audience Unlimited costs 3.3% or 4.4% of impression cost in Control Mode and is included in Performance Mode (PPC Land, 29 September 2025).
    • Publishers pay too, on one path. OpenPath carries a flat 4.5% fee charged to publishers (PPC Land, 2 July 2026).
    • "Hidden fees" became a public dispute in 2026. Publicis stopped recommending the platform in March after an audit; the two companies issued a joint statement resolving it on 12 June 2026 without public terms (PPC Land, 13 June 2026).
    • Growth slowed in 2026. Second-quarter revenue rose 3% to $715.1 million, and the company guided third-quarter revenue to at least $650 million (The Trade Desk Q2 2026 release, 6 August 2026).
    Jump to the table

    Definition

    Implied take rate (The Trade Desk): annual revenue divided by the gross spend reported for the same year, a single percentage that blends the platform fee with net revenue from data and features.

    The general question of how every DSP prices its service is covered in DSP pricing explained. This page stays with one company. For the company itself, see the The Trade Desk vendor profile.

    The Trade Desk platform fee: how it is charged

    The Trade Desk sells a self-service buying platform. Its clients are agencies, advertisers and service providers that sign master services agreements (MSAs). Those MSAs run for one year, renew automatically, carry no spend commitment and can be ended on 60 days' notice (10-K, FY2025).

    The client is billed for everything bought through the platform: media, value-added services, data and the platform fee. The company invoices monthly, usually on 30 to 90 day terms. Some agency clients have "sequential liability" terms, so they pay only after their advertiser pays them (10-K, FY2025).

    The accounting matters for anyone reading the numbers. The Trade Desk reports revenue "as an agent on a net basis". It subtracts what it pays publishers, exchanges and data sellers, which the filing calls "Supplier Components". Revenue is booked when a bid is won (10-K, FY2025). So revenue is the platform fee plus the margin on data and features, not the media.

    The filing names no rate. It lists what moves revenue per dollar of spend: service mix, client and channel mix, pricing and volume discounts. Accounting choices matter too, such as whether a supplier cost reduces revenue or counts as an expense (10-K, FY2025). Your own rate lives in your MSA or your agency's.

    What the 10-K shows: the take-rate math

    The Trade Desk discloses gross spend once a year, in its annual report. Gross spend is the client's spend on inventory, services and data, plus the platform fee. Divide revenue by gross spend and you get an implied take rate. The table shows the arithmetic, with the filing figures exactly as reported.

    4 of 4 rows

    Columns (5)

    2022

    $1,577.8M

    $7,741M

    20.4%

    2023

    $1,946.1M

    $9,611M

    20.2%

    2024

    $2,444.8M

    $12,040.9M

    20.3%

    2025

    $2,896.3M

    $13,394.7M

    21.6%

    2022

    Revenue (filing)

    $1,577.8M

    Gross spend (filing)

    $7,741M

    Implied take rate

    20.4%

    2023

    Revenue (filing)

    $1,946.1M

    Gross spend (filing)

    $9,611M

    Implied take rate

    20.2%

    2024

    Revenue (filing)

    $2,444.8M

    Gross spend (filing)

    $12,040.9M

    Implied take rate

    20.3%

    2025

    Revenue (filing)

    $2,896.3M

    Gross spend (filing)

    $13,394.7M

    Implied take rate

    21.6%

    Download JSON

    Table by AdSovereign, CC BY 4.0.

    The 2022 and 2023 gross spend figures appear in the FY2023 filing rounded to the nearest million. Every rate in the table is our division, not a number the company states.

    Three things follow from the filing. First, revenue grew 18% in 2025 while gross spend grew 11%, so the company kept more of each dollar (10-K, FY2025). The filing credits more use of value-added services and data, "increased pricing associated with value-added services and data", and higher platform fees. Second, the 21.6% blends every client. A large agency group with a negotiated rate and a small advertiser can pay very different amounts. Third, the rate is a share of gross spend, which includes the fee itself.

    That last point changes how the number compares with a quote. A 21.6% take of gross spend equals a 27.6% markup on the $10,498.4 million that went to suppliers in 2025 (our calculation from the 10-K, FY2025). When a rep quotes "a percentage of media", ask which base it uses.

    Worked example. Take a $1,000,000 annual budget and apply the 2025 average. The platform would keep about $216,200 and pass about $783,800 to publishers, exchanges and data sellers. Now apply the same rate as a markup on media by mistake: $1,000,000 of media plus 21.6% is $1,216,000. The difference is $16,000 on one budget line. All figures are our arithmetic on the 10-K, FY2025 average; your contract rate will differ.

    The company has said the rate "has been consistently around 20% of spend on our platform" (AdExchanger, 28 April 2025). Digiday's buyers put the effective fee at the mid-teens to about 20% once data, identity and measurement are loaded (Digiday, 3 December 2025). These are reported ranges, not contract terms.

    Data and feature fees on top of the platform fee

    The platform fee is one line. The Trade Desk also sells access to more than 370 third-party data vendors and reaches inventory through more than 430 directly integrated exchanges, publishers and SSPs (10-K, FY2025). Each of those relationships can add a cost.

    The table lists the fee lines a buyer can see on a Kokai campaign, with what is public about each.

    7 of 7 rows

    Columns (4)

    Platform fee

    Advertiser or agency

    Percentage of total spend; rate per contract; implied 21.6% blended in 2025

    Audience Unlimited (data)

    Advertiser or agency

    3.3% or 4.4% of impression cost in Control Mode; included in Performance Mode; a la carte data still available

    A la carte data segments

    Advertiser or agency

    Priced by each data vendor; rates n/d

    Predictive Clearing (bid shading)

    Advertiser or agency

    Charged as a share of the savings when the bid is lowered; rate n/d

    Performance features in Control Mode

    Advertiser or agency

    Priced a la carte; rates n/d

    OpenPath

    Publisher

    Flat 4.5% fee

    Exchange or SSP fee

    Publisher, out of the clearing price

    Set by each SSP; not a TTD fee

    Industry studies in the ad tech tax explained

    Platform fee

    Who pays

    Advertiser or agency

    What is public

    Percentage of total spend; rate per contract; implied 21.6% blended in 2025

    Source (date)

    10-K, FY2025

    Audience Unlimited (data)

    Who pays

    Advertiser or agency

    What is public

    3.3% or 4.4% of impression cost in Control Mode; included in Performance Mode; a la carte data still available

    Source (date)

    PPC Land, 29 Sep 2025

    A la carte data segments

    Who pays

    Advertiser or agency

    What is public

    Priced by each data vendor; rates n/d

    Source (date)

    PPC Land, 29 Sep 2025

    Predictive Clearing (bid shading)

    Who pays

    Advertiser or agency

    What is public

    Charged as a share of the savings when the bid is lowered; rate n/d

    Performance features in Control Mode

    Who pays

    Advertiser or agency

    What is public

    Priced a la carte; rates n/d

    Source (date)

    PPC Land, 29 Sep 2025

    Exchange or SSP fee

    Who pays

    Publisher, out of the clearing price

    What is public

    Set by each SSP; not a TTD fee

    Source (date)

    Industry studies in the ad tech tax explained

    Download JSON

    Table by AdSovereign, CC BY 4.0.

    Audience Unlimited is the clearest example. The company said advertisers who use third-party data "typically invest nearly 20% of their media costs on it" (company claim). It then priced bulk access as a flat share of impression cost (PPC Land, 29 September 2025). On $500,000 of impression cost, the 4.4% tier is $22,000 for data access (our calculation).

    Performance Mode bundles Audience Unlimited, Predictive Clearing, Identity Alliance, Prism and measurement into one setting. Control Mode keeps manual control and prices those features one by one (PPC Land, 29 September 2025). A consultant writing in AdExchanger argued that the trade-off between the two modes is too steep. She also questioned a bid shading fee on OpenPath supply that the company itself connects (AdExchanger, 5 March 2026). That is an opinion, and we found no published response from the company.

    The Trade Desk hidden fees: what the 2026 dispute was about

    The phrase "hidden fees" now points to one episode. In February 2026, Adweek reported that Dentsu and WPP had left OpenPath over transparency and fee concerns (PPC Land, 2 July 2026). In March, Publicis stopped recommending the platform to clients after an audit that alleged problems with fees, consent and cost transparency (Digiday, 23 March 2026).

    The Trade Desk rejected the findings. Its chief executive, Jeff Green, defended the platform's processes, and the company cited contractual limits on sharing data with the auditor (Digiday, 23 March 2026). On 12 June 2026 the two companies issued a joint statement that resolved the dispute and disclosed no terms (PPC Land, 13 June 2026). No regulator or court has ruled on the allegations.

    Digiday's sources framed the fight as a contest over margin between holding companies and the platform. They pointed to joint business plans (JBPs), which are client-level agreements that can carry rates different from those the agency negotiated (Digiday, 23 March 2026). The company told Digiday that "more and more of our business is managed through joint business plans" (Digiday, 3 December 2025).

    For a buyer, the practical lesson is narrow. A fee is "hidden" when it appears on an invoice line you did not price, or when a setting turns it on by default. The fix is a full fee schedule and the logs to check it. The checklist in our DSP RFP template asks for both.

    Products that change the bill: Kokai, OpenPath, Deal Desk, Ventura

    Kokai is the buying platform. It launched on 6 June 2023 and replaced Solimar; by February 2026 the company said almost all clients used it (PPC Land, 21 October 2026). Its pricing modes decide which features are bundled and which are billed one by one.

    OpenPath connects the DSP directly to publishers. It changes who pays: the publisher pays the flat 4.5% fee, and Green described it as "meant to be nearly breakeven to slightly profitable" (PPC Land, 13 June 2026). A buyer pays no OpenPath line, but the publisher's fee comes out of the same clearing price.

    Deal Desk launched on 9 June 2025 as part of Kokai. It centralises private marketplace and programmatic guaranteed deals and scores deal quality (PPC Land, 9 June 2025). It has no separate published fee.

    Ventura is a streaming TV operating system the company announced on 20 November 2024 for TV makers and other streaming platforms (The Trade Desk, 20 November 2024). It does not appear as a buyer fee line. It matters because it can add supply that buyers reach through the same platform.

    The agency layer: fees the platform does not set

    Most spend reaches The Trade Desk through agencies. In 2025, two holding companies each passed 10% of gross billings and together accounted for 30% (10-K, FY2025). The agency usually holds the seat, signs the MSA and invoices the advertiser.

    That puts a second fee between you and the platform. The UK competition regulator found media agency fees of 4% to 14% of open display spend in 2019, with a weighted average of 5% (CMA, Appendix R, 1 July 2020). The same study put the weighted DSP average at 14%, with self-service platforms at 4% to 16%. These figures are old, but they are the only regulator-grade split we found.

    Discounts also flow through this layer. Buyers told Digiday in December 2025 that they won tech-fee reductions of 1 to 2 points after passing spend thresholds, and post-auction discounts that had to be passed to the client (Digiday, 3 December 2025). The Q2 2026 filing confirms "volume and other discounts in connection with joint business plans" (10-Q, Q2 2026). Who keeps a discount is a contract question. The steps to check it are in how to audit your agency's programmatic buys.

    How to check what you actually pay

    1. Get the fee schedule in writing. Ask for the platform fee as a share of gross spend, the base it applies to, and every add-on that can appear on an invoice.
    2. Ask which pricing mode each campaign uses. Control Mode and Performance Mode bundle different features (PPC Land, 29 September 2025).
    3. Request the raw cost report. Match media, data, feature and platform lines to the invoice. The case for log-level data rests on this step.
    4. Read the agency contract next to the MSA. Check who holds the seat and who keeps rebates or JBP discounts.
    5. Model the whole chain. The ad tech fee chain calculator adds the SSP and agency layers; the ad tech tax explained page shows the industry studies behind each layer.

    The comparison with a commerce-owned rival is on Amazon DSP vs The Trade Desk, and Google's buying tool is covered in DV360 fees explained. The wider series sits in the in-house programmatic hub.

    FAQ

    What is The Trade Desk's platform fee?
    It is a percentage of each client's total spend on the platform, set in the client's contract. The company does not publish a rate card. Its 2025 filing implies that revenue equalled 21.6% of gross spend, which blends the platform fee with data and feature revenue (10-K, FY2025).
    Does The Trade Desk have hidden fees?
    The company says its fees are disclosed. Publicis alleged fee and transparency problems after an audit in March 2026, which The Trade Desk rejected, and the parties settled on 12 June 2026 without public terms (PPC Land, 13 June 2026). What buyers most often miss are add-on lines such as data, bid shading and measurement, which depend on campaign settings.
    What is The Trade Desk's take rate?
    About one fifth of gross spend. Our division of the filed figures gives 20.4% in 2022, 20.2% in 2023, 20.3% in 2024 and 21.6% in 2025 (10-K, FY2025; 10-K, FY2023). The company only reports gross spend annually, so there is no quarterly figure.
    Does The Trade Desk have a minimum spend?
    The filing describes MSAs with no material commitment to spend, and we found no published minimum (10-K, FY2025). In practice most advertisers buy through an agency that already holds a seat. Joint business plans can carry spend targets, but their terms are private.
    Are The Trade Desk's fees negotiable?
    Yes, within limits. Buyers reported 1 to 2 point reductions after passing spend thresholds in late 2025 (Digiday, 3 December 2025). The company's own filing cites volume discounts and joint business plan discounts as reasons revenue moves (10-Q, Q2 2026).

    How this works on owned infrastructure

    This page turns on one question: what share of each dollar a percentage-priced platform keeps, and whether you can check it line by line. AdSovereign is an enterprise RTB stack (DSP, SSP, exchange, DMP and clean room) that runs on the advertiser's own servers under a fixed licence. The cost does not rise with media spend, and every bid, win and fee is written to the advertiser's own warehouse, so reconciliation needs no request to a vendor. SSP fees and third-party data costs still apply. Whether a fixed licence beats a percentage depends on your spend, which the TCO model works out from your inputs; the architecture page shows where the logs live.

    Sources

    1. The Trade Desk, Inc., Form 10-K for fiscal year 2025 (filed 27 February 2026). https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1671933/000167193326000014/ttd-20251231.htm
    2. The Trade Desk, Inc., Form 10-K for fiscal year 2023 (filed 15 February 2024). https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1671933/000167193324000014/ttd-20231231.htm
    3. The Trade Desk, Inc., Form 10-Q for the quarter ended 30 June 2026 (filed 6 August 2026). https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1671933/000167193326000086/ttd-20260630.htm
    4. The Trade Desk, Inc., "The Trade Desk Reports Second Quarter 2026 Financial Results", Exhibit 99.1 to Form 8-K (6 August 2026). https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1671933/000167193326000085/ttd-20260806x8kexx991.htm
    5. PPC Land, "The Trade Desk launches data marketplace overhaul with AI scoring" (29 September 2025). https://ppc.land/the-trade-desk-launches-data-marketplace-overhaul-with-ai-scoring/
    6. PPC Land, "The Trade Desk gains first Dutch publisher for OpenPath at 4.5% fee" (2 July 2026). https://ppc.land/the-trade-desk-gains-first-dutch-publisher-for-openpath-at-4-5-fee/
    7. PPC Land, "Publicis and The Trade Desk make up as ad tech's trust layer cracks" (13 June 2026). https://ppc.land/publicis-and-the-trade-desk-make-up-as-ad-techs-trust-layer-cracks/
    8. Digiday, "Publicis vs. The Trade Desk isn't really about transparency: it's about who gets the margin" (23 March 2026). https://digiday.com/media-buying/publicis-vs-the-trade-desk-isnt-really-about-transparency-its-about-who-gets-the-margin/
    9. Digiday, "The Trade Desk loosens its grip on pricing amid buyer pressure" (3 December 2025). https://digiday.com/media-buying/the-trade-desk-loosens-its-grip-on-pricing-amid-buyer-pressure/
    10. AdExchanger, "Will The Trade Desk right-size its margins?" (5 March 2026). https://www.adexchanger.com/the-big-story/will-the-trade-desk-right-size-its-margins/
    More sources (5)
    1. AdExchanger, "As CTV Blooms, It's Knives Out For The Trade Desk's Take Rate" (28 April 2025). https://www.adexchanger.com/online-advertising/as-ctv-blooms-its-knives-out-for-the-trade-desks-take-rate/
    2. PPC Land, "Explaining Kokai" (21 October 2026). https://ppc.land/kokai/
    3. PPC Land, "Trade Desk launches Deal Desk to manage advertising deals" (9 June 2025). https://ppc.land/trade-desk-launches-deal-desk-to-manage-advertising-deals/
    4. The Trade Desk, "The Trade Desk Announces Ventura, a Revolutionary Streaming TV Operating System" (20 November 2024). https://www.thetradedesk.com/us/news/press-room/the-trade-desk-announces-ventura
    5. UK Competition and Markets Authority, "Online platforms and digital advertising market study, Appendix R: fees in the adtech stack" (1 July 2020). https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5fe49625e90e071207e10eff/Appendix_R_-_fees_in_the_adtech_stack_WEB.pdf
    Changelog
    • 9 November 2026: first version. Q3 2026 10-Q not yet filed at research cut-off; add it when available.