DSP Pricing Explained 2026: Take Rates, Fees and Minimums

A DSP charges in one of three ways: a percentage of media spend (The Trade Desk's 2025 filing implies 21.6% (10-K, FY2025)), a flat software fee (white-label and bidder-as-a-service), or a negotiated rate that is never published (Amazon, DV360, Yahoo, Basis). Data, verification, managed service and log-level data are billed on top.

This page separates the numbers that are public (SEC filings, vendor pricing pages, regulator data, the ANA benchmark) from the numbers you have to ask for. It ends with a $1 million budget pushed through three pricing models, with every rate sourced or marked as an assumption.

1. Percentage of media spend. The platform fee is a cut of every dollar that passes through. The Trade Desk states that it charges "a platform fee that is generally based on a percentage of our clients' total spend on the platform" and reports revenue net of media (The Trade Desk 10-K, FY2025). Most self-service enterprise DSPs work this way. The rate is negotiated per contract and almost never published.

2. Flat software fee. The vendor charges a monthly license, sometimes with a volume cap (queries per second, impressions) and sometimes with a floor expressed as a percentage of spend. This is the white-label and bidder-as-a-service model. Epom's two listed tiers are "5% of your ad spend or $250 per month, whichever is higher" and "5% of your ad spend or $2000 per month, whichever is higher" (Epom DSP pricing, accessed 17 October 2026). Beeswax, now part of FreeWheel, was described at acquisition as software that "sits in buyers' own clouds and uses a software-as-a-service pricing model" (Beet.TV, 18 December 2020).

3. Negotiated or embedded. The platform does not publish a rate card and may embed its margin in the media price. The clearest example is Google Ads as a buyer, which the CMA found "does not charge fees but it instead retains the difference between advertiser payments to it and the bids submitted to exchanges", a spread of 10% to 20% of spend over the twelve months to October 2019 (CMA, Appendix R, 1 July 2020). Amazon's product page now says "Your current pricing structure is carried forward" and "Contact your Amazon Ads account executive with pricing questions" (Amazon Ads, accessed 17 October 2026).

The three models cannot be compared on the headline rate, only on the full fee stack for a given budget, which the worked example below does.

"Public" means the figure appears in a filing, a vendor pricing page, a regulator report or the ANA benchmark. "Reported" means trade press or a dated third-party guide. "n/d" means not disclosed anywhere we could find as of 17 October 2026. Every row should be re-confirmed in an RFP; the DSP RFP template has the questions.

The hard numbers come from one securities filing, one regulator report that is seven years old, and software vendors selling to agencies. The large DSPs publish nothing.

The platform fee is the visible line. The following are billed in the same invoice or by the vendor's partners, and they are where the all-in take rate diverges from the headline.

Data fees. Third-party audience segments are priced per thousand impressions or as a share of media. Google's guidance for DV360 is "$0.50 to more than $2 CPM", and when lists from different providers match the same impression the advertiser pays "the combined cost of all audience lists that match a given impression" (Google DV360 Help, accessed 17 October 2026). Retail and commerce media audiences are billed "as a percent of media cost", sometimes with a CPM cap; Google's worked example is "15% of media cost with a $2.00 CPM cap" (Google DV360 Help, accessed 17 October 2026). The Trade Desk said on 29 September 2025 that advertisers who use third-party data "typically invest nearly 20% of their media costs on it" and introduced Audience Unlimited at 3.3% or 4.4% of impression cost in Control Mode, or included in Performance Mode (PPC Land, 29 September 2025). The ANA's benchmark, which measures what advertisers actually paid, found median DSP data costs of 1.0% of spend in Q1 2025 (ANA Benchmark, Q1 2025) and an average of 2.7% in the Q3 2025 waterfall (ANA Benchmark, Q3 2025).

Managed service fees. When the vendor's team runs the campaigns, a service fee is added to the platform fee. The only reported figures are Amazon's: a 15% service fee on top of a 10% platform fee, with a $50,000 minimum, per documentation summarised on 18 July 2025 (PPC Land, 15 October 2026). The CMA found that DSPs offering managed or enhanced services had average take rates of 20% to 42% in 2019, versus 4% to 16% for self-service platforms (CMA, Appendix R, 1 July 2020). Agencies add their own layer on top.

Verification and ad serving. Pre-bid and post-bid verification (viewability, fraud, brand safety) and the advertiser ad server are charged per thousand impressions by their vendors, often through the DSP. Vendor rate cards are not public. The ISBA study measured demand-side technology fees, "mainly ad serving, verification tools and data", at an average of 10% of advertiser spend, and DSP plus technology fees in aggregate at 18% (ISBA, May 2020). The ANA's waterfall leaves them out entirely.

Log-level data. Impression-level logs are the raw material for fee audits, attribution and in-house optimization, and they are a separately negotiated item. Microsoft's documentation for the Xandr feeds is explicit: "If you are interested in receiving log level data feeds, talk to your Xandr representative about the data your use case will need, technical setup, and pricing", the feeds "are not available via the API", and delivery is by batch file (Microsoft Learn, updated 22 October 2025). DV360 Data Transfer, The Trade Desk's REDS and Amazon Marketing Cloud follow the same pattern: the product exists, the price is "ask". The ANA benchmark reports that only 21 of 39 participating marketers in Q3 2025 had been granted access to their own log-level data, "highlighting the continued problem for marketers to freely access and use their impression log-level data" (ANA Benchmark, Q3 2025). What you lose when a rented platform closes is covered in Life After Microsoft Invest.

Supply-side fees you do not see. After the DSP, the SSP takes its share before the publisher is paid. The ANA measured SSP platform costs at 12.8% of advertiser spend in Q3 2025 (ANA Benchmark, Q3 2025); the CMA's weighted SSP average was 16% of the value of ads sold, ranging from 8% to 25% (CMA, Appendix R, 1 July 2020). Adalytics observed one SSP charging a single publisher "between a 7 and 42% supply fee" on different impressions (Adalytics, April 2022). They are not DSP fees, but they come out of the same budget.

The example pushes a $1,000,000 annual open-web programmatic budget through three contracts. It counts fees only. It does not count media productivity losses (non-viewable, non-measurable, invalid or made-for-advertising impressions), which the ANA puts at 37.2% of spend in Q3 2025 (ANA Benchmark, Q3 2025); those apply to all three models and are covered in The Ad Tech Tax 2026. Staff and agency costs are also excluded.

Rates used, with their status:

Results (all dollar figures calculated from the rates above):

In the table above, the buy-side fee stack ranges from 13% to 33% of budget depending on the contract, before any media is bought. The managed-service model costs $43,600 more than self-serve on the same budget: the price of not having a trading team. The flat-license model reaches 75.9% only because the vendor's 5% floor is low, and it assumes you bring your own SSP relationships, staff and data pipelines.

Sensitivity: where a flat fee beats a percentage. A flat fee is expensive at low spend and cheap at high spend. The break-even is the license divided by the percentage rate. Using the 20% self-serve platform fee above and a hypothetical all-in flat license of $180,000 a year (an assumption for a bidder-as-a-service or self-hosted stack including cloud, since no vendor publishes a price), the break-even spend is $900,000. At $1 million the two are within $20,000 of each other. At $5 million the percentage model costs $1,000,000 and the flat model $180,000. At $20 million the gap is $3,820,000 a year, all calculated from the stated assumption. The maths is simple; the missing input is the real flat fee, which only an RFP will produce. The engineering and staffing side of that choice is in How to Build a DSP in 2026 and Bidder-as-a-Service vs White-Label DSP vs Self-Hosted DSP.

The question has three honest answers, depending on what "start" means.

Renting a white-label front end starts at $250 a month on Epom's Light plan, capped at 5,000 queries per second, or $2,000 a month on Pro, each with a 5% of spend floor and a possible $500 setup fee (Epom DSP pricing, accessed 17 October 2026). TeqBlaze says a white-labelled version can launch in two to three weeks and quotes per project (TeqBlaze, accessed 17 October 2026). You are still paying SSP fees on every impression and you do not own the bidder.

Licensing a bidder you run yourself (bidder-as-a-service) replaces the percentage with a usage-based flat fee. Beeswax's model at the time of its acquisition by FreeWheel: "Clients pay a flat fee based on tech usage instead of a spend fee" (PPC Land, 17 December 2020). No current price list is public.

Building or deploying your own stack has no public price because the cost is people, infrastructure and integrations rather than a license. The inputs are the bid request volume you must handle, the latency budget, the number of SSP integrations and the team. Our self-hosted DSP infrastructure requirements and QPS, latency and bid performance pages give the engineering inputs; the canonical cost model will be on How to Build a DSP in 2026. What is already known from the ANA is the prize: marketers who control their log-level data and supply paths converted 52.3% of spend into quality impressions in Q2 2026, against 31.1% for the lower-performing cohort (ANA via Fiducia, 6 August 2026).

Because most rates are "ask", the RFP is where pricing becomes real. The DSP RFP template carries the full list; the pricing section should at minimum demand:

1. The platform fee as a percentage of gross spend, by channel (display, video, CTV, audio), and whether it changes with volume tiers.
2. Every fee that can appear on an invoice, with its basis: data (CPM or percent of media), verification, ad serving, managed service, creative, reporting, API access, log-level data.
3. Whether any margin is taken inside the media price (spread) rather than as a fee, and a written statement that no undisclosed fees exist.
4. Log-level data: fields, delivery (batch or stream), latency, retention, format and price.
5. Minimum spend, notice period and what happens to audiences, logs and reporting history on termination. The Microsoft Invest playbook shows why the last point matters.
6. Audit rights and reconciliation: the right to match your DSP logs against SSP logs, which the ISBA and ANA studies both found necessary to see the full take (ISBA, May 2020).

Agency contracts need the same discipline; see Executive actions on rebates and kickbacks for the agency side and 12 ad tech cost optimization strategies for the operating levers once the contract is signed. The in-house programmatic hub collects the rest of this series, including why brands bring programmatic in-house and the real cost of cloud DSPs and data ownership.

How much does Amazon DSP cost? Amazon does not publish a rate card. Its product page says "Your current pricing structure is carried forward" into Amazon Ads Agent and refers pricing questions to an account executive (Amazon Ads, accessed 17 October 2026). Documentation summarised in July 2025 put the managed service at a $50,000 minimum, a 15% service fee and a 10% platform fee (PPC Land, 15 October 2026). Reports on the self-service minimum conflict: one dated guide says Amazon removed it in November 2025 (Nova Data, updated 8 October 2026), while Digiday reported on 11 November 2025 that the DSP kept its minimums (PPC Land, 15 October 2026). Ask for both in writing.

What is The Trade Desk's take rate? About one fifth of spend. Revenue of $2,896.3 million against gross spend of $13,394.7 million in 2025 implies 21.6%, and 20.3% in 2024 (The Trade Desk 10-K, FY2025). The company said in April 2025 that the rate "has been consistently around 20% of spend on our platform" (AdExchanger, 28 April 2025). Individual contracts vary; Needham has estimated a 12% to 15% range for the platform fee alone (PPC Land, 4 September 2026).

Does DV360 charge a platform fee? Yes, but Google does not publish it. The UK CMA, using 2019 data supplied by Google, estimated the DV360 take rate at 5% to 15% plus third-party fees (CMA, Appendix R, 1 July 2020). Google's own help pages are specific only about data: third-party lists cost "$0.50 to more than $2 CPM" (Google DV360 Help, accessed 17 October 2026).

How much does it cost to start a DSP? From $250 a month for a white-label front end with a 5% of spend floor (Epom DSP pricing, accessed 17 October 2026), to a usage-based flat fee for a bidder-as-a-service (PPC Land, 17 December 2020), to a build whose cost is staff and infrastructure rather than a license. No vendor publishes a bidder-as-a-service or self-hosted price; the figure comes from an RFP.

Are DSP fees negotiable? Yes. The Trade Desk's filing lists "pricing competition, volume discounts and shifts in media, client and channel mix" among the reasons its revenue may not grow in line with spend (The Trade Desk 10-K, FY2025). The CMA found DSP take rates ranging from 5% to 42% across platforms in 2019 (CMA, Appendix R, 1 July 2020). What is rarely negotiable without log-level data is visibility into the fees taken after the DSP.

1. The Trade Desk, Inc., Form 10-K for fiscal year 2025 (filed February 2026). https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1671933/000167193326000014/ttd-20251231.htm
2. PPC Land, "Trade Desk posts $2.9B in 2025 revenue but growth slows to 18%" (27 February 2026). https://ppc.land/trade-desk-posts-2-9b-in-2025-revenue-but-growth-slows-to-18/
3. AdExchanger, "As CTV Blooms, It's Knives Out For The Trade Desk's Take Rate" (28 April 2025). https://www.adexchanger.com/online-advertising/as-ctv-blooms-its-knives-out-for-the-trade-desks-take-rate/
4. PPC Land, "Explaining take rate" (4 September 2026). https://ppc.land/take-rate/
5. PPC Land, "The Trade Desk launches data marketplace overhaul with AI scoring" (29 September 2025). https://ppc.land/the-trade-desk-launches-data-marketplace-overhaul-with-ai-scoring/
6. Amazon Ads, Amazon DSP / Amazon Ads Agent product page (accessed 17 October 2026). https://advertising.amazon.com/solutions/products/amazon-dsp
7. PPC Land, "Meta named a future that never came. Amazon Ads Agent names one that exists" (15 October 2026). https://ppc.land/meta-named-a-future-that-never-came-amazon-ads-agent-names-one-that-exists/
8. Nova Data, "Amazon DSP guide 2026: minimum spend, setup, benchmarks" (published 6 November 2025, updated 8 October 2026). https://novadata.io/resources/blog/amazon-dsp-guide
9. Media Planning Tool, "Amazon DSP Review 2026" (accessed 17 October 2026). https://www.mediaplanningtool.com/amazon-dsp
10. Amazon Ads, "unBoxed 2025 recap" (11 November 2025). https://advertising.amazon.com/library/news/unboxed-2025-recap
11. Google, Display & Video 360 Help, "Tips for using third-party audience lists" (accessed 17 October 2026). https://support.google.com/displayvideo/answer/6212219?hl=en
12. Google, Display & Video 360 Help, "About commerce audiences" (accessed 17 October 2026). https://support.google.com/displayvideo/answer/16640028?hl=en
13. UK Competition and Markets Authority, "Online platforms and digital advertising market study, Appendix R: fees in the adtech stack" (1 July 2020). https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5fe49625e90e071207e10eff/Appendix_R_-_fees_in_the_adtech_stack_WEB.pdf
14. StackAdapt, "Plans and packages" (accessed 17 October 2026). https://www.stackadapt.com/plans-and-packages
15. Basis Technologies, platform page (accessed 17 October 2026). https://basis.com/technology/platform
16. Epom, "DSP pricing" (accessed 17 October 2026). https://epom.com/pricing/dsp
17. Epom, "White-label DSP" (accessed 17 October 2026). https://epom.com/demand-side-platform/white-label
18. TeqBlaze, "White-label DSP" (accessed 17 October 2026). https://teqblaze.com/white-label-dsp
19. PPC Land, "FreeWheel to acquire Beeswax" (17 December 2020). https://ppc.land/freewheel-to-acquire-beeswax/
20. Beet.TV, "FreeWheel Buying Beeswax to Enable Publisher Audience Extension" (18 December 2020). https://www.beet.tv/2020/12/freewheel-buying-beeswax-to-boost-ad-demand.html
21. Microsoft Learn, "Log Level Data Feeds" (updated 22 October 2025). https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/xandr/log-level-data/log-level-data-feeds
22. PPC Land, "Microsoft Monetize's survival bet: LinkedIn data on Amazon DSP CTV" (7 May 2026). https://ppc.land/microsoft-monetizes-survival-bet-linkedin-data-on-amazon-dsp-ctv/
23. ANA and TAG TrustNet, "Programmatic Transparency Benchmark: Q3 2025 Benchmark Findings" (November 2025). https://s3.amazonaws.com/media.mediapost.com/uploads/Q32025ProgrammaticTransparencyBenchmark.pdf
24. ANA and TAG TrustNet, "Programmatic Transparency Benchmark: Q1 2025 Benchmark Findings" (data to 31 March 2025). https://s3.amazonaws.com/media.mediapost.com/uploads/ANAQ12025Programmatic.pdf
25. ISBA and PwC, "Programmatic Supply Chain Transparency Study, executive summary" (May 2020). https://www.isba.org.uk/system/files/media/documents/2020-12/executive-summary-programmatic-supply-chain-transparency-study.pdf
26. Fiducia, "ANA Programmatic Transparency Benchmark: Q2 2026 Working-Media Efficiency Reaches a Record 45%" (ANA release of 6 August 2026). https://www.fiducia.eco/post/ana-programmatic-transparency-benchmark-q2-2026-working-media-efficiency-reaches-a-record-45
27. Adalytics, "How much in fees are ad tech companies charging publishers & advertisers?" (April 2022; coverage in AdExchanger, 14 April 2022). https://adalytics.io/blog/adtech-supply-fees